Nadler, Lofgren Demand Administration Comply with Legal Requirement for Refugee Consultation, Urge Against Further Cuts to Refugee Admissions
Washington, D.C. – Today, House Judiciary Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-NY) and Subcommittee on Immigration and Citizenship Chair Zoe Lofgren (D-CA) sent a letter to Secretary of State Mike Pompeo,Acting Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Kevin McAleenan, andHealth and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Alex Azar demanding the Administration engage in consultations with Congress, as required by law, prior to making a final determination on the allocation of refugee admissions for the coming fiscal year. The letter also urges the Administration to consider the severe repercussions of making further cuts to the U.S. refugee admissions program.
September 13, 2019 The Honorable Michael R. Pompeo The Honorable Kevin K. McAleenan The Honorable Alex M. Azar II Dear Secretary Pompeo, Acting Secretary McAleenan, and Secretary Azar: We write to express our alarm that the Administration appears to be taking a cavalier approach to the statutory requirements and historic norms for the presidential determination for refugee admissions. For the past two fiscal years, the Administration has set historically low levels of refugee admissions while side-stepping or only nominally complying with critical legal requirements for consultation. With FY 2020 only 17 days away, we expect the Administration to comply with the law this year. As you are aware, pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1157, designated representatives of the President are required to consult with members of the House and Senate Committees on the Judiciary on annual refugee admissions. The statute requires the Administration to initiate such consultation prior to the start of each fiscal year by reporting to the Committees, the "foreseeable number of refugees who will be in need of resettlement," and the "anticipated allocation of refugee admissions during the fiscal year."[1] The Administration must also meet "in person" with the Committees prior to the President making a final determination on the allocation of refugee admissions.[2] The presidential determination must be made before the start of the fiscal year.[3] Satisfying these legal requirements ensures that the presidential determination for refugee admissions considers the views and priorities of Congress, thereby complying with the congressional intent underlying 8 U.S.C. § 1157. Last year, the consultation process failed to comply with the statute. On September 17, 2018, Secretary Pompeo submitted a report to Congress on proposed refugee admissions for the fiscal year.[4] However, the Administration failed to consult Congress on this proposal until after the start of the fiscal year.Despite this delayed consultation, the President memorialized the proposed refugee admissions ceiling on October 4, 2019- only three days after the consultation, without amendment and without adequate consideration of the views and priorities of Congress.[5]This approach to the consultation process undermines our ability to conduct meaningful oversight of U.S. refugee policy, which is a key component of the Refugee Act of 1980-a bipartisan law that Congress unanimously passed. We have also been alarmed by reports regarding the proposed refugee ceiling. Since the creation of the United States refugee resettlement program in 1980, the United States has committed to resettling an average of 95,000 refugees each year, and has admitted an average of 85,000 refugees annually.[6] Rejecting abundant evidence in favor of resettling large numbers of refugees in promotion of the U.S. economy[7] and defense[8] interests, the Trump administration set the refugee admissions ceiling at 45,000 and 30,000 for fiscal years 2018 and 2019, respectively. In July, media reports revealed that the Administration is considering cutting refugee admission numbers to as low as zero for the coming fiscal year.[9]These cuts further undermine our nation's core values, including our historic commitment to refugee resettlement, and critical foreign policy interests abroad. We are increasingly disturbed by the Administration's disregard for legal requirements, congressional intent, and the importance of refugee resettlement to our nation. This year, we expect that the Administration will comply with the law by providing the required report to Congress and initiating the consultation process shortly. Accordingly, we ask that the Administration provide the information required under 8 U.S.C. § 1157(e) to our Committees at least 14 days prior to the date of the consultation, and request a staff briefing be held after this information is provided, but prior to the scheduled consultation.[10]Finally, we urge the administration to consider the severe repercussions of further cutting the U.S. refugee admissions program. Sincerely, ____ Jerrold Nadler ____ Zoe Lofgren [1] 8 U.S.C. § 1157(d)(1). |
### |