Press Releases
Ranking Members Raskin and Connolly Demand Answers Regarding Widespread Firings, Involuntary Reassignments of Career Employees at DOJAfter Pledging to Maintain Merit-Based System for Federal Employment, Trump’s Acting AG Prioritizes Political Loyalty Over Merit
Washington,
January 28, 2025
Washington, D.C. (January 28, 2025)— Rep. Jamie Raskin, Ranking Member of the House Judiciary Committee, and Rep. Gerald E. Connolly, Ranking Member of the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, are demanding answers from the Department of Justice (DOJ) and Acting Attorney General James R. McHenry III following reports of sweeping firings and involuntary reassignments of career civil servants at the Department.
“The professionals you summarily dismissed or transferred from components throughout the Justice Department […] are part of an expert, non-political workforce tasked with protecting our national security and public safety. They have been hired and promoted based on their professional merit and excellence. Many of them have decades of experience under their belt and have served under, been promoted by, and received awards from presidential administrations of both major political parties, including President Trump’s first administration. Yet, you appear to have removed them from their offices without regard to their demonstrated competencies, their recognized achievements, or their devoted service to the Department […] By removing them from their positions in this hasty and unprincipled way, you have very likely violated longstanding federal laws,” wrote the Ranking Members.
Reports indicate that the Trump Administration has made widespread changes at DOJ within its first week, taking aim at civil servants of all ranks—from senior career employees to law students. The sweeping personnel changes targeting prosecutors and federal agents within days, and in some cases even hours, of the start of the new Administration, without any evaluation of their qualifications, mark a departure from DOJ’s longstanding principles and may be in violation of federal law.
|