Press Releases

Nadler, Lofgren, Lowey, Roybal-Allard, Feinstein, Durbin Submit Comment Opposing USCIS Proposal to Increase Processing Fees for Citizenship and Asylum Seekers

Washington, December 31, 2019

Washington, D.C. – Yesterday, House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-NY) and Immigration and Citizenship Subcommittee Chair Zoe Lofgren (D-CA), along with House Appropriations Chairwoman Nita M. Lowey (D-NY), Homeland Security Appropriations Chairwoman Lucille Roybal-Allard (D-CA), Senate Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) and Subcommittee on Border Security and Immigration Ranking Member Dick Durbin (D-IL), submitted comments toU.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) opposing the agency's latest proposed fee rule, which would dramatically hike fees forimmigration benefits, including those for asylum seekers and DACA recipients, and eliminate nearly all fee waivers and exemptions. As noted by the Members, the proposed fee increase is based on an incomplete and flawed cost analysis, undermining Congress’s ability to conduct oversight.It would also prevent poor families and vulnerable individuals from obtaining immigration benefits, including naturalization, and would make no measurable improvement to USCIS’s historically high case backlog.

A full version of the comments can be found here.


On November 14, 2019,the Trump Administration proposed to increase fees for immigration benefits by a weighted average of 21% and eliminate almost all fee waivers and exemptions. When viewed as a whole, this proposal appears to be a pretext to make the U.S. immigration system inaccessible to working class families. The Administration seeks to impose a new fee for asylum applicants, making the United States one of only four countries, alongside Iran, Fiji, and Australia, to charge a fee for this important form of humanitarian protection. The proposal would also raise the naturalization fee by 83 percent—and eliminate reduced fee options for low income applicants. USCIS justifies the fee increase by projecting a $1.2 billion funding shortfall, but fails to explain over half of this shortfall and includes an unauthorized transfer of funds to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Before DHS can implement the Administration’s proposal, DHS must provide the public with a complete and accurate assessment of its budget and a reasonable justification to increase fees.